2006 CORN ROOTWORM EFFICACY TRIAL
YIELDGARD ROOTWORM COMPARISON TO SOIL INSECTICIDES AND SEED TREATMENTS1
Final Report
University of Nebraska
Agricultural Research and Development Center
Mead, Nebraska
Lance J. Meinke, Jim Brown,
Laura Campbell, Bill McCormick
Department of Entomology
University of Nebraska
Lincoln, Nebraska 68583-0816
1 The data presented in this report are not to be released to the public without the written
permission of the Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska.
Background information pertaining to the experiment conducted at the ARDC, near Mead, Nebraska during 2006.
Agronomic
Hybrids: DKC 60-17, DKC 60-13
Row Spacing: 30 inches
Planting Date: 27 April 2006
Planter: Kinze model 2100, 4 row cone
Planting Depth: 2 inches
Application Equipment: Granular insecticide
Planting: planter mounted cone-belt system
Liquid insecticide
Planter mounted CO2 pressurized sprayer
Field Preparation: 10 March 2006 - chopped and disked, 18 April 2006 - disked
Herbicides Applied: 28 April 2006: Cintch ATZ, 2.6qt/ac, pre emerge
5 June 2006: Spirit 1.0 oz/ac
Fertilizer Applied: 150 lb. N per acre applied as NH3, 13 April 2006
Previous Crop: Continuous corn (trap crop)
Soil Information:
Type: Silty clay loam
Ph: 6.4
CEC: 29.4
% organic matter: 2.8
% clay: 29.05
% silt: 66.67
% sand: 4.28
Plant Population: There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) among treatment stand count means at V3-V4 growth stage (Hanway 1997). The overall mean number of plants per 33.5 ft + SEM = 41.9 + 0.4
Insecticide History: Insecticide free: 1999, 2001, 2003, 2005
Multiclass soil insecticide trials: 1998, 2000, 2002, 2004
Entomological
Species present: Northern corn rootworm, Diabrotica barberi Smith and
Lawrence, and western corn rootworm, D. virgifera virgifera LeConte. Initial rootworm egg hatch occurred between 27-29 May 2006 (predominantly western corn rootworm).
Root Evaluation: 0-3 root rating scale (Oleson et al. 2005) was used to evaluate larval corn rootworm damage in each treatment. Five roots per replication were evaluated in each treatment.
Root Evaluation Date: 12 July 2006
Experimental Design
Design: Randomized complete block design
Replicated four times
Single-row treatments
Row Length: 33.5 feet
Statistical Analysis: Root ratings, stand: Used SAS Mixed Procedure; Protected LSD
test was used for mean separation (P ≤ 0.05) .
Environmental
Conditions at planting:
Air temperature: 26°C
Wind speed: 10 mph at 5 ft height
Wind direction: W
Soil temperature 2" depth: 19°C
Soil temperature surface: 29°C
Soil moisture, 0-3" depth: not recorded
% cloud cover: 25 % cloud cover
% relative humidity: not recorded
Residue on surface: 30% of soil surface covered with crop residue; soil
moist, some clods on surface
Rainfall
| April | 01 | 0.24 inch |
| 02 | 0.40 | |
| 06 | 0.91 | |
| 07 | 0.01 | |
| 15 | 0.12 | |
| 24 | 0.30 | |
| 25 | 0.23 | |
| 28 | 1.45 | |
| 29 | 0.30 | |
| 30 | 0.17 | |
| April | Total | 4.13 inches |
| May | 02 | 0.03 inch |
| 03 | 0.06 | |
| 08 | 0.35 | |
| 11 | 0.01 | |
| 23 | 0.64 | |
| 26 | 0.04 | |
| 27 | 0.06 | |
| May | Total | 1.19 inches |
| June | 04 | 0.32 inches |
| 16 | 0.60 | |
| 17 | 0.90 | |
| 24 | 0.34 | |
| 25 | 0.10 | |
| June | Total | 1.94 inches |
| July | 02 | 0.16 inches |
| 08 | 0.42 | |
| 10 | 0.40 | |
| 13 | 1.65 | |
| 21 | 0.62 | |
| July | Total | 3.25 inches |
| August | 01 | 0.13 inches |
| 02 | 0.02 | |
| 05 | 0.21 | |
| 06 | 0.72 | |
| 07 | 0.50 | |
| 08 | 2.16 | |
| 10 | 0.13 | |
| 16 | 0.77 | |
| 17 | 0.11 | |
| 18 | 0.19 | |
| 27 | 0.34 | |
| 28 | 0.01 | |
| August | Total | 5.29 inches |
Irrigation (through August 2006):
Sprinkler irrigation was applied as needed throughout the season.
June 1 1.00 inches August 04 1.5 inches
15 1.0
30 2.0
July 7 1.0 inches
26 1.25
Table 1. 2006 Corn Rootworm Soil Insecticide Experiment 1.
University of Nebraska Agricultural Research and Development Center, near Mead, NE
Root Damage Evaluation
Insecticide |
Rate/Placementa |
Mean Root Damage Ratingb (0-3 scale) |
YieldGard Rootworm +Poncho 250 |
0.25 mg ai/seed ST |
0.03 a |
Regent 4 SC |
0.13 lb ai/A 5 gpa, mtube I |
0.12 ab |
Regent 4 SC + Poncho 250 |
3.25 oz/A 5 gpa mtube I, 0.25 mg ai/seed ST |
0.16 abc |
Aztec 4.67G |
0.14 I smartbox appl. |
0.18 abc |
Regent 4 SC + Regent TS |
2.08 oz/A 5 gpa mtube I, 2.0 oz/100 wt seed ST |
0.19 abc |
A14974 250 CS |
1.12 g ai/100 row m TB |
0.21 abc |
Fortress 5G |
0.20 I smartbox appl. |
0.26 abc |
Lorsban 15G + Poncho 250 |
0.9 TB, 0.25 mg ai/seed |
0.26 abc |
Lorsban 15G |
1.2 TB |
0.30 abcd |
Aztec 2.1G |
0.141 TB |
0.31 abcd |
A14974 250 CS |
1.12 g ai/100 row m I |
0.33 abcd |
Force 3G |
0.12 TB |
0.34 abcd |
Poncho 1250 |
1.25 mg ai/seed ST |
0.34 abcd |
Capture 2EC |
0.09 TB 5 gpa, water carrier |
0.38 bcd |
Capture LFR |
0.09 TB 5 gpa, water carrier |
0.38 bcd |
Cruiser 5 FS |
1.25 mg ai/seed ST |
0.43 bcd |
Regent TS |
2.0 oz/100 wt seed ST |
0.46 cd |
Poncho 250 |
0.25 mg ai/seed ST |
0.59 d |
Untreated (2) |
|
1.22 e |
Untreated (1) |
|
1.51 f |
|
|
|
a Rate presented as oz ai per 1000 row ft except where other units listed:
TB = T-band, 7-inch band placed over the open seed furrow;
I = placed in the open seed furrow;
ST = seed treatment.
A14974 250 CS is a liquid formulation of tefluthrin
b Root rating scale used: 0 - 3 scale (Oleson et al. 2005); within columns, mean root rating values
followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other (Fisher’s protected LSD test
@ 0.05 significance level). No plant lodging was observed in any treatment on 10 July 2006.