NebraskaEntWeb logo
University of Nebraska-Lincoln


2000 CORN ROOTWORM SOIL INSECTICIDE EVALUATIONS
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
MEAD, NEBRASKA

Lance J. Meinke, Jim Brown, Jenny Stebbing, Bill McCormick
Department of Entomology
University of Nebraska
Lincoln, Nebraska 68583-0816

Background Information - AgronomicBackground Information - Entomology
Experimental DesignEnvironmental Conditions at Planting
Rainfall and Irrigation
Corn Rootworm Seed Treatments Experiment 1Corn Rootworm Seed Treatments Experiment 2

Background Information -Agronomic

Hybrid: Experiment 1: Pioneer 33G26
Experiment 2: N58-D1
Row Spacing: 30 inches
Planting Date 26 April 2000
Planter: Kinze model 2100, 4 row cone
Planting Depth: 2 inches
Application Equipment: Granular Insecticides
Planting: Planter mounted cone-belt system
Field Preparation: Spring 2000 - disked and harrowed
Herbicides Applied: 4 May 2000: Bicep II Magnum, 2.1 qt./A, pre-emerge
Fertilizer Applied: 150 lb. N/A applied as NH3 on 4 April 2000
Previous Crop: Continuous corn (trap crop)
Soil Information:
Type: Silty clay loam
Ph: 6.4
CEC: 29.4
% organic matter: 2.8
% clay: 29.05
% silt: 66.67
% sand: 4.28
Plant Population: Overall mean number of plants/33.5' ± SEM
Experiment 1: 46.9 ± 0.6
Experiment 2: 45.5 ± 0.8
Phytotoxicity: There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) among treatment stand count means or among number of abnormal plants/treatment at V2-3 growth stage (Hanway 1997).
Insecticide History: Insecticide free: 1991, 1993, 1994, 1997-1999
Multiclass soil insecticide trials: 1990, 1992, 1995-1996

Background Information - Entomology

Species Present: Northern corn rootworm, Diabrotica barberi Smith and Lawrence, and western corn rootworm, D. virgifera virgifera LeConte. Initial rootworm egg hatch detected 24 May 2000 (predominantly western corn rootworm)
Root Evaluation: A 1 - 6 root rating scale (Hills and Peters, 1971) and 0 - 3 root rating scale (Oleson and Tollefson, unpublished) were used to evaluate larval corn rootworm damage in each treatment. Five roots were evaluated in each treatment per replication. (See Nebguide G92-1108-A for the 1 - 6 rating scale description, and the Iowa State University Corn Rootworm Home Page for the 0 - 3 rating scale description.)
Root Evaluation Date: 13 July 2000

Experimental Design

Design: Randomized complete block design
Replicated four times
Single row treatments
Row Length: 33.5 feet
Statistical Analysis: Root Ratings: Standard ANOVA procedures, LSD test was used for mean separation where statistical differences (P less than or equal to 0.05) occurred.

Environmental Conditions at Planting

Air Temperature:17oC
Wind speed:10-15 mph at 5 ft. height
Wind direction:SE
Soil temperature 2" depth:15oC
Soil temperature surface:18oC
Soil moisture, 0-3" depth:18.6% water (gravimetric method)
% cloud cover:100%
% relative humidity:not recorded
Residue on surface:40% of soil surface covered with crop residue; soil very moist

Rainfall and Irrigation

April 10 0.45 inch
15 0.55 inch
27 0.45 inch
30 0.20 inch
Total 1.65 inches
May 08 0.75 inch
18 0.40 inch
20 0.20 inch
26 0.90 inch
30 0.25 inch
Total 2.50 inches
June 10 0.70 inch
12 0.30 inch
13 0.45
15 0.20 inch
20 0.80 inch
24 1.80 inches
25 2.20 inches
Total 6.45 inches
July 02 0.20 inch
04 0.50 inch
12 0.50 inch
16 0.25 inch
18 0.80 inch
20 0.20 inch
28 0.60 inch
29 0.30 inch
Total 3.35 inches
Irrigation was applied once between planting and root damage evaluation - 9 June 2000, 0.60 inches

Corn Rootworm Seed Treatment - Experiment 1


Insecticide Rate/Placement1 Mean Root Damage Rating2
  (1-6 scale)(0-3 scale)
   
Aztec 2.1GTB2.40a0.23 a
Force 3.0GTB2.95a0.46 a
Gaucho 00MW018 A40.60 mg/k ST3.85 b1.30 b
Gaucho 00MW018 A21.35 mg/k ST4.15 b1.69 b
Gaucho 00MW018 A31.00 mg/k ST4.20 b1.58 b
Untreated 5.30 c2.55 c


1Aztec 2.1G rate applied: 0.141 oz ai/1000 row ft; Force 3.0G rate applied: 0.12 oz ai/1000 row ft; TB = T-band, 7-inch band placed over the open seed furrow; mg/k = milligrams per kernal, ST = seed treatment.

2Root rating scales used: 1 - 6 scale (Hills and Peters 1971); 0 - 3 scale (J. Oleson and J.J. Tollefson, Iowa State University); Within columns, mean root rating values followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other (Fisher's protected LSD test @ 0.05 significance level).

Corn Rootworm Seed Treatment - Experiment 2

Insecticide Rate/Placement1
oz ai/1000 ft.
Mean Root Damage Rating2
  (1-6 scale)(0-3 scale)
   
Counter 20 CR 1.2 TB 2.25 a0.21 a
Force 3G 0.12 TB 2.45 a0.20 a
Lorsban 15G 1.2 TB 2.50 a0.21 a
ProShield Force ST ST 3.20 b0.71 b
Untreated 4.15 c1.48 c

1ProShield Force ST applied as a seed treatment at label rate, tefluthrin loaded onto the seed equal to 63% of Force 3G rate; TB = T-band, 7-inch band placed over the open seed furrow; ST = seed treatment.

2Root rating scales used: 1 - 6 scale (Hills and Peters 1971); 0 - 3 scale (J. Oleson and J.J. Tollefson, Iowa State University); Within columns, mean root rating values followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other (Fisher's protected LSD test @ 0.05 significance level).

Back to Biology and Treatment Recommendations

Back to Nebraska EntWeb