2002 CORN ROOTWORM SOIL
INSECTICIDE EVALUATION1
Final Report
University of Nebraska
Agricultural Research and Development Center
Mead, Nebraska
Lance J. Meinke, Jim Brown, Jenny Stebbing,
Laura Campbell, Bill McCormick
Department of Entomology
University of Nebraska
Lincoln, Nebraska 68583-0816
1 The data presented in this report are not to be released to the public without the written
permission of the Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska.

Background Information - Agronomic
| Hybrid: | Pioneer 33G26 |
| Row Spacing: | 30 inches |
| Planting Date: | 3 May 2002 |
| Planter: | Kinze model 2100, 4 row cone |
| Planting Depth: | 2 inches |
| Application Equipment: | Granular insecticides Planting: planter mounted cone-belt system |
| | Liquid insecticides Planter mounted CO2 pressurized sprayer | | Field Preparation: | Spring 2002 - disked and harrowed |
| Herbicides Applied: | 3 May 2002: Bicep II Magnum, 2.0 qt/A, pre emerge 31 May 2002: 1.0 oz Permit and 0.5 oz Accent / A |
| Fertilizer Applied: | 150 lb. N/A applied as NH3, 5 April 2002 |
| Previous Crop: | Continuous corn (trap crop) |
| Soil Information: | | Type: | Silty clay loam |
Ph: | 6.4 |
CEC: | 29.4 |
% organic matter: | 2.8 |
% clay: | 29.05 |
% silt: | 66.67 |
% sand: | 4.28 |
| Plant Population/ Phytotoxicity: | There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) among treatment stand count means, or among number of abnormal plants per treatment at V2-3 growth stage (Hanway 1997). Because there was a strong trend toward plant stand differences among treatments (P = 0.06) stands ± SEM are presented for each treatment in Table 1. The overall mean number of plants/33.5' ± SEM = 47.0 ± 0.3. |
| Insecticide History: | Insecticide free: 1993, 1997, 1999, 2001 Multiclass soil insecticide trials: 1994-1996, 1998, 2000 |
Background Information - Entomological
| Species present: | Northern corn rootworm, Diabrotica barberi Smith and Lawrence, and western corn rootworm, D. virgifera virgifera LeConte. Initial rootworm egg hatch occurred between 31 May - 3 June 2002 (predominantly western corn rootworm). |
| Root Evaluation: | 1-6 (Hills and Peters 1971) 0-3 root rating scales were used to evaluate larval corn rootworm damage in each treatment. Five roots were evaluated in each treatment and replication. |
| Root Evaluation Date: | 16 July 2002 |
Background Information - Experimental Design
| Design: | Randomized complete block design
Replicated four times
Single row treatments |
| Row Length: | 33.5 feet |
| Statistical Analysis: | Plant Stands, Root Ratings: Standard ANOVA procedures; LSD test was used for mean separation where statistical differences (P = 0.05) occurred. |
Background Information - Environmental
| Conditions at planting: | Air temperature: | 23°C |
Wind speed: | 15-20 mph at 5 ft height |
Wind direction: | South |
Soil temperature 2" depth: | 21°C |
Soil temperature surface: | 28°C |
Soil moisture,0-3" depth: | 18.5 % water (gravimetric method) |
% cloud cover: | clear, 0 % cloud cover |
% relative humidity: | not recorded |
Residue on surface: | 30% of soil surface covered with crop residue; soil very moist, somewhat cloddy |
Background Information - Rainfall and Irrigation
| April |
|
|
May |
|
|
June |
|
|
July |
|
|
| |
08 |
0.04 inch |
|
01 |
0.08 inch |
|
10 |
0.20 inch |
|
06 |
0.51 inch |
| |
11 |
0.24 inch |
|
06 |
0.20 inch |
|
11 |
0.04 inch |
|
07 |
0.24 inch |
| |
16 |
0.39 inch |
|
10 |
0.04 inch |
|
12 |
0.28 inch |
|
10 |
0.12 inch |
| |
20 |
0.35 inch |
|
11 |
1.14 inches |
|
|
|
|
21 |
0.08 |
| |
21 |
0.04 inch |
|
17 |
0.04 inch |
|
|
|
|
22 |
0.24 inch |
| |
22 |
0.08 inch |
|
22 |
0.12 inch |
|
|
|
|
26 |
0.24 |
| |
24 |
0.04 inch |
|
23 |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
27 |
1.61 inches |
|
24 |
0.67 inch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
26 |
0.35 inch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
28 |
0.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total |
2.79 inches |
|
Total |
2.96 inches |
|
Total |
0.52 inches |
|
Total |
1.43 inches |
Irrigation (through July 2002):
Sprinkler irrigation was applied periodically between planting and root damage evaluation.
| June | 25 | 1.0 inch | | July | 5 | 1.5 inches |
| | 28 | 2.5 inches | | | 26 | 2.0 inches |
Experimental Formulations/Applications Evaluated - 2002
|
| Compound | | Company |
|
| Leverage 2.7 SE | | Bayer |
| HM0117 1.15 G | | Helena |
| HM2042B | | Helena |
| Fortress 3.5 G | | AMVAC |
|
Root Damage Evaluations
Table 1. 2002 Corn Rootworm Soil Insecticide Experiment 1. University of Nebraska Agricultural Research and Development Center, near Mead, Ne
Root Damage Evaluation
|
| Insecticide |
Rate/Placementa |
Mean Root Damage Ratingb |
Plant Stand |
| |
|
(1 - 6 scale) |
(0 - 3 scale) |
Per 33.5 ft row ± SEM |
|
| Leverage 2.7SE |
see footnote c |
2.00a |
0.06a |
49.8± 1.1 |
| Aztec 4.67G |
0.14 I smartbox appl. |
2.30ab |
0.09a |
48.5± 0.6 |
| Aztec 2.1G |
0.141 TB |
2.55a-c |
0.21a |
47.5± 1.7 |
| Capture 2EC |
see footnote d |
2.60a-c |
0.26ab |
48.3± 0.9 |
| Regent 4SC |
see footnote e |
2.70a-d |
0.44a-c |
48.5± 0.9 |
| Aztec 4.67G |
0.14 TB smartbox appl. |
2.75a-d |
0.25ab |
46.0± 1.8 |
| Lorsban 15G |
1.2 TB |
2.80a-d |
0.44a-c |
47.5± 1.2 |
| Force 3G |
0.12 TB |
2.80a-d |
0.43a-c |
47.8± 1.2 |
| Fortress 3.5G |
0.18 I smartbox appl. |
2.90a-e |
0.46a-c |
47.3± 0.9 |
| Counter 20CR |
1.2 TB |
3.15a-e |
0.72a-c |
44.0± 2.0 |
| Fortress 5G |
0.18 I smartbox appl. |
3.20a-e |
0.65a-c |
50.3± 0.9 |
| HM2042B |
see footnote f |
3.30a-f |
0.68a-c |
47.5± 1.4 |
| Counter 20CR |
1.2 I |
3.40b-f |
0.98a-d |
47.8± 0.9 |
| Lorsban 15G |
1.2 I |
3.45 b-f |
0.89a-d |
45.5± 1.2 |
| Fortress 2.5G |
0.18 I |
3.55b-f |
1.07a-e |
45.5± 1.3 |
| HM0117 1.15G |
0.068 I |
3.65c-f |
1.02a-d |
46.8± 1.5 |
| HM0117 1.15G |
0.09 TB |
4.00d-g |
1.31b-e |
45.3± 2.0 |
| HM0117 1.15G |
0.09 I |
4.00d-g |
1.36c-e |
48.5± 0.5 |
| HM0117 1.15G |
0.068 TB |
4.15e-g |
1.48c-e |
46.0± 1.1 |
| Thimet 20G |
1.2 TB |
4.15e-g |
1.40c-e |
45.8± 0.9 |
| Untreated |
|
4.60fg |
1.82de |
44.8± 0.9 |
| Untreated |
|
5.10g |
2.15e |
45.0± 1.8 |
|
a placement:TB = t-Band, 7-inch band placed over the open seed furrow;
I = placed in the open seed furrow;
b Root rating scales used: 1 - 6 scale (Hills and Peters 1971); 0 - 3 scale (J. Oleson, Iowa State University); Within columns, mean root rating values followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other (Fisher's protected LSD test @ 0.05 significance level).
c Leverage 2.7 SE rate: 1.68 oz ai/1000 ft row; volume: 5 gallons water/A, TB application.
d Capture 2EC rate: 0.075 oz ai/1000 ft row; volume: 5 gallons water/A, TB application.
e Regent 4SC rate: 0.13 lb ai/A; volume: 4 gallons water/A through microtube into open seed furrow.
f HM2042B rate: 0.34 oz formulation/1000 ft row; volume: 2 gallons water/A through microtube into open seed furrow.
|
|